Irony As A Political Weapon : Diamonds And Dogs
Irony, in the Socratic sense of this term, is the adoption of an attitude of pretended ignorance when talking to a person so as to to allow her to present her views on a certain matter in a relaxed manner. In this blog, however, I use the term 'irony' in a more political sense to mean a device through which I pretend to accept some of the dominant self-images of my generation precisely to expose their inner contradictions. (And to the extent that I have made it clear how I understand and use this term, I am a Transparent Ironist.) For example, you will often find me arguing against 'tolerance' not because I am an intolerant bigot who believes that atheists should be burnt at the stake but because atheism itself may sometimes become a disguised version of intolerance. Again, I occasionally argue against relativism (the view that no trans-cultural dialogue is possible) not because I believe that European values can be readily universalised and exported to the colonies, but because relativism itself may masquerade as a subtle form of universalism. Irony can turn out to be an especially powerful weapon when discussing gender issues, and to see how it can subvert/invert some established dualities between 'masculinity' and 'feminity', consider the following nest of ironies about Diamonds and Dogs.
Irony, in the Socratic sense of this term, is the adoption of an attitude of pretended ignorance when talking to a person so as to to allow her to present her views on a certain matter in a relaxed manner. In this blog, however, I use the term 'irony' in a more political sense to mean a device through which I pretend to accept some of the dominant self-images of my generation precisely to expose their inner contradictions. (And to the extent that I have made it clear how I understand and use this term, I am a Transparent Ironist.) For example, you will often find me arguing against 'tolerance' not because I am an intolerant bigot who believes that atheists should be burnt at the stake but because atheism itself may sometimes become a disguised version of intolerance. Again, I occasionally argue against relativism (the view that no trans-cultural dialogue is possible) not because I believe that European values can be readily universalised and exported to the colonies, but because relativism itself may masquerade as a subtle form of universalism. Irony can turn out to be an especially powerful weapon when discussing gender issues, and to see how it can subvert/invert some established dualities between 'masculinity' and 'feminity', consider the following nest of ironies about Diamonds and Dogs.
We are regularly told that diamonds are a woman's best friend. Perhaps so. But rarely are we informed that a woman who buys this dictum is also the best friend of the diamond merchant in whose factory underpaid women labour from morning till midnight. So here is the cycle : A diamond merchant, usually a man, sells the idea that it is cool for women to buy diamonds, and women fall for this trap and buy them little realising that it is yet another 'male conspiracy'. And what about the menfolk? Well, dogs definitely are men's best friends. Dogs are so awwwwww, so cuuuute, and so cho chweet; they are indeed the most beautiful thing that God ever created (except, of course, the men themselves). Someone called Madame de Stael even remarked that the more she saw of dogs, the more they reminded her of men. With such nonsense being hurled at them, can we blame men for complaining that life is a bitch?
8 Comments:
At 17.2.05, Anonymous said…
The poster itself tells the truth about a woman's life.........
Two sides of the same coin.
At 18.2.05, Anonymous said…
Hmmm...it's rather the truth about a CERTAIN type of woman's life!
At 18.2.05, Anonymous said…
Hey, but I don't get the irony in the latter part. Please be a little more transparent...
The dilettante ironist
At 18.2.05, Anonymous said…
At 10:01 PM, Anonymous said…
The poster itself tells the truth about a woman's life.........
Two sides of the same coin.
At 7:35 AM, Anonymous said…
Hmmm...it's rather the truth about a CERTAIN type of woman's life!
I mean to say in most of the aspects of life there is a two sided picture for same life. and not only the picture we are getting from the poster....only we have to understand it.
At 18.2.05, Anonymous said…
Good blog again!
First of all, i am a woman,
second of all, i do not think diamonds are a woman's best friend. (Not that i have any personal vendatta against rocks). I think a woman's best friends (yes she gets to have two!) are forgetfullness and lightness.
And about a man's best friend? I don't know. Maybe there are some men around who still deserve to have friends.
I am very saddened by Madame Stael's comment. I personally like dogs and i don't think they merit insults such as a comparision to men.
A bit about underpaid women and diamond factories. Well, anything that we consider of any value has been erected/created on the foundation of suffering, blood and sacrifice of nameless millions. I can't see how we will circumvent this unless we start devaluing the things that we value such as material embellishments, comfort etc.
Keep blogging.
At 18.2.05, The Transparent Ironist said…
Yes, I agree. I love dogs so much that I believe that Madame de Stael was extremely unfair in comparing them to men. But then, as we say, it really is a dog's life after all.
At 18.2.05, The Transparent Ironist said…
There is not much irony in the last sentence in the post. It is just that I wonder why we men keep on comparing life to a bitch. Why not, say, to an ewe, to a doe, or to a kitty?
At 1.3.05, Anonymous said…
I am a simple guy. I like the left side of the picture, I hope that does not hurt sentimalities.
Post a Comment
<< Home